Although my street is a former woodlot chock full of very tall trees with sturdy branches, my property is conspicuously void of trees in the middle of the yard, and all overhanging tree limbs have been cleared. Presumably, a former owner wanted trees along the perimeter but an open, sunny center.
There was only one branch on the entire property which could be used to hang the hammock. If it were not the only one, it would be a bad choice:
- It is in the front yard, not the back where I would have more privacy
- It is directly over the driveway, so the hammock is suspended over cement slab
- It does not extend far from the tree trunk, so swinging motions are constrained
- It's pretty high, but higher would be better
My hammock is the normal kind which is intended to be hung from two points. Since a branch offers only one point, I used a ten-foot long two-by-four board to separate the ends, allowing a comfortable spread across which to stretch out. A few people have commented that this solution is remarkably clever, but I have to disagree; I think it was obvious.
The hammock is fun to swing in. The nearby tree trunk can be used to push off from, or one can swing the other way. The period of a swinging pendulum is a function of the length of the rope (or whatever) it is suspended by. In my case, it's about 35 feet tall, giving a period of about six seconds. That's nice and slow, but the cool young boy down the street makes me jealous with an even taller swing, and his swings with a period of about seven-and-a-half seconds.